The End of Race:

We have all heard the statement "we're all one race, the human race". Yet just a century ago the existence of distinct biological races was taken for granted. How did our perception of race change so drastically?

1/20 🧵 pic.twitter.com/w2Vn1MTvzw

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

2/20 Racial anthropology emerged as a distinct field of study in the 19th century.

By the late 19th C. and into the early 20th C. more genetic determinist accounts of race had begun to dominate the academy, alongside the rise of Social Darwinism and the eugenics movement. pic.twitter.com/UkaEoTZiBa

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

3/20 By the 1920s and 30s, things began to move in a more environmentalist direction, largely due to the influential work of the anthropologist Franz Boas and his students. pic.twitter.com/ksilAgvykg

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

4/20 Boas was a German Jewish immigrant to the United States.

Boas was a left-liberal, heavily influenced by his experience of anti-Semitism in his early life. He said it was the greatest disappointment of his life when he witnessed the nationalism that the Great War brought. pic.twitter.com/7ighOr4ZeN

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

5/20 "Boas did not arrive at the position from a disinterested, scientific inquiry… There is no doubt that he had a deep interest in collecting evidence and designing arguments that would rebut or refute an ideological outlook—racism"
– Carl N. Degler pic.twitter.com/xtDFLPBNf0

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

6/20 Boas would train a generation of anthropologists that would dominate the newly emergent field of anthropology:

“Much of twentieth-century American anthropology may be viewed as the working out of various implications in Boas’s own position.”
– George W. Stocking pic.twitter.com/IKUuTqrnNw

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

7/20 For Boas, conventional approaches to the study of race were supremacist, imposing false ideas like “civilised” and “barbarian” on human groupings.

Instead, study of other cultures should instead show the arbitrariness of our own values, and lead to an embrace of relativism. pic.twitter.com/EGvaiBkH5O

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

8/20 “anyone who is familiar with the history of Africa before its subjugation by the Europeans, knows the industrial skill, the artistic genius, the political ability of the N-gro. In every region from West Africa through the Sudan to South Africa we have proof of it.”
– Boas pic.twitter.com/f5TPaSDM40

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

9/20 One of Boas' most influential students would be Ashley Montagu – born Israel Ehrenberg to a Jewish family in London’s East End – who completed a dissertation under Boas in 1937. pic.twitter.com/Ry0o8aIejS

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

10/20 Montagu's 1942 work Man's Most Dangerous Myth: the Fallacy of Race, which was based on his dissertation, attacked the biological basis for race and deconstructed the concept as one which developed in the 18th century as a response to slavery and colonialism. pic.twitter.com/dobeJJn7cE

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

11/20 While Montagu’s book received mostly negative reviews from other academics, he would have the honour of playing a leading role in UNESCO’s highly influential Committee on The Race Question. pic.twitter.com/Lx3v3wgLkw

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

12/20 In response to the racialism at the center of National Socialist ideology, UNESCO convened a panel to produce a series of expert statements on race and offer a definitive condemnation of racism both morally and scientifically.

The panel, chaired by Montagu, consisted of: pic.twitter.com/lNjUnbqhVz

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

13/20 "A team of ten scientists all of whom were recruited from the marginal group of anthropologists, sociologists and ethnographers affiliated with the scientifically marginalized groups of cultural anthropologists that were mostly students of Franz Boas"
-Poul Duedahl pic.twitter.com/XBgEipgX0p

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

14/20 The final statement declared the controversial beliefs of the cultural determinists who made up the panel to be scientific fact.

Underlying this historic statement was “widespread revulsion at the Jewish Holocaust.”
-David Cannadine, The Undivided Past pic.twitter.com/hmQ15n2wZF

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

15/20 When The Statement On Race was first published in 1950, it was accompanied by a Press Release which stated “No biological justification for race discrimination, say world scientists: Most authoritative statement on the subject.” pic.twitter.com/oadQf97t77

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

16/20 Upon the release of the statement, the New York Times responded with a headline proclaiming: “No Scientific Basis for Race Bias Found by World Panel of Experts.” pic.twitter.com/8t4XLblMYG

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

17/20 The statement gave scientific credibility to the claims of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and formed the basis for several future UN conventions aimed at targeting racism.

It has been described as “the triumph of Boasian anthropology on a world-historical scale” pic.twitter.com/K3SGiKSMo4

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

18/20 It was called upon for the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education which outlawed segregation in public schools, where UNESCO’s work was treated as the most up to date scientific consensus on race, and cited as influential in the final ruling by the Chief Justice. pic.twitter.com/au2OBNNA0U

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

19/20 “All of a sudden social scientists had become social engineers. The extent of the attention paid to them during the trials had diminished the authority of biological arguments and confirmed the impression that segregation was of a political and historical character”
Doudahl pic.twitter.com/xhhOBvlkXk

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023

20/20 The work of many of Boas's students, such as Margaret Mead, was later roundly refuted by other anthropologists as ideologically motivated.

Yet despite their hostile reception among other academics, the Boasian cultural anthropologists won the 20th Century. pic.twitter.com/DhHp0AHALj

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) May 10, 2023